How To Make A Journalist Happy

Photo by Gülfer ERGİN

Hi everyone

Happy January. I hope you're enjoying the start to the new year.

About four years ago I listened to a talk by moral philosopher Peter Singer at Hay Festival where he posed the question: what would you do if you saw a young boy drowning in a pond? Well, of course, if you're physically able to you'd try to save him, wouldn't you? But then, he asked, if we know millions of children are dying as a result of say poverty or malaria worldwide every year why aren't we saving them? It was a thought-provoking question. And so this was Singer's powerful introduction into the subject of effective altruism – doing the most good you can do – and exploring one of the ways you can help achieve that: by pledging to donate a significant portion of your income (usually 10% or more) to effective charities, ones where your money goes the furthest in terms of helping people, namely by saving lives.

His talk stayed with me. I bought one of his books at the festival, signed up to donate to effective charities (through an organisation called GiveWell), lined up an interview with Singer himself, and wrote an article for the Observer on people who have pledged to donate 10% or more of their income for their working life. Admittedly I've not signed the pledge myself (honestly as a result of not affluent enough with a career in journalism but there's people on lower incomes than I who have committed) but I've kind of been obsessed with the movement ever since and have knocked out pieces about it for the i newspaper and more recently the BBC.

I'm bringing this up as recently Giving What We Can (GWWC), the organisation which people pledge through and who helped me source the great case studies, emailed me after the BBC piece had gone live to show me a chart of the people who had signed up the pledge as a result of reading the article. In a world where you're fervently working away on an article, which might garner perhaps with the odd retweet and share, before you're busy squirrelling away on the next, that email lightened up my day and made it feel all worthwhile. More often than not us journalists never really find out the results of our articles so to receive an email that highlighted what had happened after it had gone into the ether was really heartwarming. I thanked them for sharing that.

I covered the organisation in a Guardian piece at the start of this year and again GWWC sent me a quick email to say people had joined after reading the piece. Now I don't expect journalists would want continual updates and about anything (for example, if they'd written about a new retail POS system and 20 independents had bought it as a result of their piece - and I'm not knocking that as I used to cover the retail industry - or rather if a lawyer's website had received 2,000 hits thanks to that divorce piece in the Telegraph), but I do think sometimes – when it calls for it – to share a strong reaction to a piece, especially when it might make them feel fuzzy inside, would be appreciated. In a world of gloom, showing us why we do what we do despite the low pay and so on, can be wonderful, and also beneficial for relationship building too.

Thanks for reading.

Have a great week.

Susie